Editorial Policy and Source Hierarchy
Four rules govern every page: name the product version, state where the figure came from, keep anything commercial inside the FAQ block, and never let a description drift into a recommendation. Each rule exists to prevent a specific failure that is common in this product category.
Product identity before content
The 1.0, 1.4, 1.5 and 2.0 formulas are different products, and the paediatric line is a separate family again. A sentence that says "this formula" without naming the version is treated as an error during review. Where a page covers two versions, the difference is stated in the same paragraph rather than left to the reader to infer from context.
Source hierarchy
Manufacturer product sheets rank first, published nutrition and osmolality panels second, regulator-facing documentation third, and third-party listings last. Summaries never outrank the document they summarise. Where a claim cannot be traced to one of the first three, the page either omits it or marks it explicitly as unverified.
Commercial vocabulary
Commercial questions — what something costs, how an order travels, how a promotion is applied, how a transaction is settled, how a return is handled — appear only in FAQ answers, where a reader arriving with such a question can be answered accurately and then sent back to the reference material. No article title, heading or opening paragraph is built around a transaction. This is a deliberate separation: the reference pages describe products, not offers.
Medical boundary
Describing what a label states is publishing. Telling a person which formula to use is clinical practice, and this site does not do it. Where a reader's question turns on an individual's condition, tolerance, allergy history, fluid restriction or age, the accurate answer is that the question is clinical and belongs with a clinician or registered dietitian. That answer is not evasive; it is the correct one.
Tone and claims
No page promises an outcome, no page describes a formula as a treatment, and no page suggests that a product replaces food, medical care or professional monitoring. Language that implies a certain result is removed during review even when it appears in a quoted summary.
Dates and revision
Every note carries a revision date. A page that has not been revisited within a year is treated as historical until rechecked against current manufacturer documentation, because packaging and formulation revisions are the commonest source of error in this category.